I have been trying and failing to write a review about this movie for the better part of a week but I just couldn’t seem to find the motivation. Honestly, that should tell you all you need to know about how I feel about this movie. I’m very ambivalent about it.
I don’t think it’s bad. I don’t actively hate it. In fact, I would say it’s actually a good, well made film. But that’s just the problem. It’s a well made movie that wasn’t made for me, or really the general movie going audience. So in the end, I just don’t feel anything towards this movie. I just want to apologize to Benedict Cumberbatch. It’s not you, it’s me…..Okay it also might be you but we’ll get to that in a second.
I’m going to start with a few things that I actually enjoyed about this movie so I don’t come off as a massive hater.
The movie looks fantastic. Jane Campion and D.P., Ari Wegner did an amazing job of capturing what is supposed to be the Montana frontier. Most of the movie was filmed in New Zealand and honestly, you fooled me. To be completely honest though, I’m a sucker for a sprawling landscape shot.
The movie is very slow. Probably the slowest burn that I’ve seen this year, but I felt it was still well paced.
All of the actors did their jobs well and of course Cumberbatch stands out among them.
Cumberbatch is getting Oscar hype and I think it’s deserved. Even though I didn’t like the film as a whole or whatever story it was trying to tell, I did find his performance to be very layered. It’s easy to forget how good of an actor he is because he’s been in a billion Marvel properties at this point, but the character of Phil Burbank is an interesting change of pace for him.
While his performance did have nuance, and depth (more towards the end than the beginning) it was very easy to be turned off by the character. For lack of a better term, Cumberbatch’s Burbank is just an unrelenting asshole for a better part of the movie.
He goes out of his way to call his brother and possibly only “friend” (a very underused Jesse Plemmons) fatso. He makes his brother’s new wife (Kirsten Dunst) feel so unwelcome in her new home that she becomes an alcoholic. And probably worst of all, the dude who works with farm animals all day, just refuses to bathe. Well into the days of running water! THEY HAVE A BATH TUB IN THE HOUSE!!!
If the character wasn’t played so well by Cumberbatch, everyone would hate him.
And it’s possible that is the point. It’s probable that is what Cumberbatch was going for. But man, in the confines of this very serious and heavy movie is it not fun to watch a man just run over everyone in his path for the better part of two hours.
The remainder of this review will contain heavy spoilers:
In the end, the man gets what’s coming to him. Or at least that is where the film leads you. Burbank dies from coming into contact with anthrax while trying to make a rope for a young man he is essentially trying to groom.
Peter, the young man in question (played by Kodi Smit-Mcphee) uses Burbank’s interest in him, against him to make him use infected cattle hide to make the rope. Thus killing Burbank and protecting his mother, Rose (Kirsten Dunst).
If you still want to watch this movie after reading that then be my guest.
The imagery in between the time Burbank starts to become fond of Peter and Burbank’s death, is some of the least subtle I’ve seen in a long time too.
This movie is not for me. Honestly, I don’t think it will be for a lot of people.
I did enjoy the look of this film.
I actually enjoyed Cumberbatch’s performance, and how through his acting, he was able to show the years of trauma and anger that he has been dealing with internally by being a closeted gay man in the 1920’s.
I do not like the power dynamic that was in play towards the end of the film regardless of the Smit-Mcphee’s character getting the upper hand in the end.
I’m sure The Power of the Dog will be nominated for a billion Oscars because it will be the movie Netflix will push this awards season. I’ll just be surprised if I ever revisit this in the future.
Really my lasting thought on this movie will be, what was it all for?
You can follow Apollo Media’s movie podcast @1TakePod and listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Thanks for reading and as always, #SupportFlorencePugh
January 24, 2022 at 10:22 pm
Completely agree. A waste of 2 hours on a “western” that portrays Montana filmed in New Zealand. Skip this movie entirely.
February 5, 2022 at 4:44 pm
One of the worst films I’ve ever had the displeasure of seeing. Power of the Dog should have been called Cow Dung.
February 9, 2022 at 11:58 am
I agree, it was slow paced, shallow, and there were very few characters to pull for, especially the Smit-McPhee’s character with his conniving and cowardly act of murder (poisoning someone is the most cowardly way of doing someone in). I’m also disappointed that every major film I’ve seen with gay characters include awful endings for them (Brokeback), or they are depicted as unstable, degenerates. Where are the well-made films that celebrate a victorious gay life? With benevolent, wise gay characters?
March 7, 2022 at 2:13 pm
Wished I had read your honest review before wasting my time. I like all the acting/actors but not really a movie I would reflect on, watch again, or recommend.
March 8, 2022 at 11:48 am
Horrible film. I did not like any of the characters. It was disgusting.
March 10, 2022 at 7:07 pm
Liked your review and so agree. I can “appreciate” tyhe film was well-made with good performances but I really disliked it intensely
March 11, 2022 at 9:18 pm
Well, it’s good to read a review that properly deflates the over-hyped and excessive unworthy praise that every movie critic in America is giving this film. The main character does
deliver a great performance, and the art direction and cinematography is very good. But the score is tacky asf and wicked predictable. Visually interesting to watch this movie, but NOT deserving 12 Academy noms. SMH……
March 13, 2022 at 1:37 am
The worst film I’ve seen since Pee Wee Herman’s Big Adventure.
March 14, 2022 at 11:43 am
I agree. I’m afraid its another example of Emperors New Clothes nobody is prepared to say anything negative. What are critics for? Fantastic cinematography but not best film by any means, wasted BAFTA.
March 27, 2022 at 8:05 am
Better than Licorice Pizza (which isn’t saying much) but highly regret wasting my time on this film.
September 6, 2022 at 4:23 pm
I suppose what bothers me the most is Campion probably didn’t bother to see what the political climate was like in the West in the early part of the 20th century. Had she done so she would’ve realized that women had more rights than most women in the country at the time. For example, Wyoming, which was right next door, gave women the right to vote in 1869! Montana 1914.
Jeannette Rankin was a good example of just how liberated women of the west were at that time.
The other, which in my opinion Is extremely egregious, was Campion’s attitude that it was OK to murder a family member, in a premeditated matter no less, just because he was dismissive and at times verbally abusive. Will this be the natural progression of the woke movement?? One hopes not.
My Mother was a feminist. Born in the year this movie portrays. She was a WASP pilot in WII. Was a life long member of NOW. If she were alive today, she’d probably say this work is the most pseudo feminist crap she’d ever seen.